http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=125Since getting my EET in electronics before the army days, and now taking classes, both in CAD and physics, (physics being my first love), i have joined the many with growing concerns about CERN, and the effects of voltages over 1kev and heavy elements, gold, lead ect being used for collisions. Even back before the civil war, during Stonewall Jackson is quoted in 1862 as saying "There is no killer like hot lead on a cold day." This is true even today as far as CERN is concerned.
Some of the Math is beyond me for sure, I do not claim to understand it all, yet I do have a good grasp on the basic reactions achieved so far with CERN and wanted to share this site of info with the ones that can grasp the total chances here of this instance. THE QQBOMB.
The most explosive substance in the known universe, nothing compares to it, no science fiction writers could describe it, no human could be aware of its true power to wipe off humans from the globe. Yet in a few days time 11-9-10 CERN will use hot hot hot lead, (my favorite in 12 g slugs) to perhaps produce strangelets.
(Funny too,(side note) Larry S, A MIT guy, says even given the size of the core lead atoms nucli parts used, at the speed and energy just before collision, this piece of lead, (lol), will have the energy equal in striking power, of 3.9 million 12 g shotguns firing one oz slugs at 1500fps. (i would hate to be holding that one). (Now i know what to hunt my next deer with)
If you have ever studied what these really are in 4thdm and 5dm physics, you can clearly see they are not play toys that we know how to play with. These are clearly energies that top the 1kev previous test and make playing with fire have new meanings.
In fact just a few strange quarks are needed if even one, to make the mother of nuclear bombs look like a wet firecracker.
((From the site...
In the graph, bunches of protons with hundreds of times less quarks than the lead ions which will collide the 11/9 have formed a drop of unstable quark-gluon liquid, a fermion condensate, surprising CERN’s physicists. On the ion collisions the 11/9 there will be hundreds of times more quarks packed together, bound to create stable strangelets (u,s, d quark liquids)
More bad news coming. Yesterday CERN gave the news that a quark-gluon liquid was starting to form with simple proton/proton collisions. Given the fact that energy becomes mass, E=Mc2, the quarks inside the protons multiplied in enormous numbers and since the bunches of protons collided at close distances, they massed in a bose-einstein fermion liquid (ridge on the picture) that ‘surprised’ again all scientists. As we explained in our post – The Grand Design – God created the Universe – we exists in an organic, fractal Universe that forms herds, which feed and reproduce constantly self-similar forms. Thus those quarks reproduced thousands of quarks merely departing from a proton. Needles to say when the hundreds of quarks inside the lead hadrons collide, there will be more than enough quark liquid to create stable strangelets that will start the dreaded ice-9 reaction. Time is running out for the press, the military and the governments to stop this experiment.))
I would urge some here to have the ability to understand the site listed's post, to send a letter to their senator concerning this chance that CERN on this day could in fact start something they cannot finish.
(like a letter would stop them)
Even the mildest reaction, of such a stable quark would be beyond any event yet recorded on this earth to date. ( and would just ruin sf)
This is in some ways a battle of Einstine vs Hawkin as well as others, yet i have always found that Einstine was not always right but he was never wrong.
A Fermi paradox is about to occur if anyone gets to see it. I dont think the outcomes of what is learned on that level, will amount to much useful know how in the lifespan of us today, and playing with things that are that dangerous is much like a 1840's miner/chemist screwup thinking he could make kitchen table nitro when someone comes in and slams the door. Exit miner stage roof.
Even in some aspects of other things ive read after doing more than reading this one page, about this, things like Shrodenger's Cat applies to this, being (observed), As MIT students this year have written papers on this, as a Shrodenger's proof making this more likely to occur (their using detectors, ie a observer), than not. Long Being actions occur proved, more when so observed than when not. Current odds using the Cramens system, is about 33 percent for this event. Using the current guidelines that CERN has posted openly for this set of test. (I personally like strange quarks in my soup :-))
I agree that to learn new things requires folks to go to greater and greater length to prove them, yet this isent going to the moon, unless your on the chuck of earth that makes it to the moon after such quark soup is created.
Most of the advanced nuts say the quarks will anti out, and not be stable because of no mass, as at terminus have no longer after the collision any real speed thus mass to remain stable, yet.. do you know that for a fact?
I would be interested in the thoughts of some here to explain risk vs advanced learning. I see trial and error from behind 20 mile blast proof walls safe, where some here im sure would gladly stick finger in barrel of gun to see if finger can stop bullet close up.
check it out and comment, i think at min they are playing with dangerous unknowns, and at best playing with unknowns period. (and that last one is not always bad believing that's how man does make advances)
Mars and the qqbomb.
(ps my next missile design will feature the qqbomb) its fired from outside the system so that when it detonates in the star, the star goes supernova and ends the system, i should rack up the points then huh..
sadly they want to do that here on earth soon. )
but if your a web bot fan 11-9 has even other meanings right?
